Came across the portrait of 15thC Lancastrian diplomat Edward Grimston by Petrus Christus (dated 1446) yesterday at the National.... I'd never noticed this before! It's actually the property of the Earl of Verulam, Grimston's distant ancestor, but has been on loan to the NG since 1927.I haven't rooted around much on the identification of its sitter, or provenance - Lorne Campbell's catalogue refers the reader in a note to articles by A.W.Franks and G.Scharf in vol.40 (1866) of Archaeologica - but what is unmistakable are the Lancastrian links the sitter is fondling. Whatever is known, its seems a firm enough identification... the ODNB entry for Grimston makes much of the fact that this is the earliest recorded portrait of a non-royal Englishman, barring the (debatable) case of Cardinal Henry Beaufort by van Eyck that is in Vienna. 
Having just read up on that (Hunter, 1993, Art Bulletin), it seems that attribution is far from accepted: general opinion still seems to hold that this is a portrait by the Papal nuncio Cardinal Nicolo Albergati, whereas the writer doubts whether the sitter is Albergati based on his appearance, or indeed a cardinal at all on the basis of his costume... which of course also rules out Beaufort. Once again, we have a 15thC Northern work that lacks a consensus of opinion!
Obviously, there is reams of literature of Beaufort, one of the chief powers in the land throughout the reins of Henry IV, Henry VI, the infancy of Henry VI and that king's "Dual Monarchy" of England and France. As one of the wealthiest of all prelates, he was and is seen as as precursor to Cardinal Wolsey.
As for Grimston, there is understandably less to go on, but he does merit a page or so in the ODNB. I'll have to see if I can obtain that 1866 issue of Archaeologica.....
No comments:
Post a Comment